15.3 Abdication of Responsibility: The Blight of Fatherlessness

  

Copyright © 2025 Michael A. Brown


      One of the saddest and most significant statements in the word of God with respect to a father’s role regarding his children is the final verse right at the end of the Old Testament in the book of Malachi:

‘He will turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers; or else I will come and strike the land with a curse.’ (Mal. 4:6)

      In the wider context of the book of Malachi, this verse seems to dovetail with earlier verses about the increasing practice in those days within Israelite society of husbands breaking faith with their wives and not being faithful to their marriage covenant (as we saw in an earlier blog, cf. Mal. 2:13-16).  An ‘easy come, easy go’ attitude towards divorce always carries with it consequences for children who are caught up in the separation of their parents.  The children too often end up being brought up by a struggling single mother and are effectively abandoned by their father (although if the woman remarries then a step-father can fulfil some of the role and responsibilities that the biological father should have done, but no longer does).  I believe that this is what Malachi is referring to in 4:6 – distant, estranged fathers who no longer carry their God-given responsibility towards their children.  The relationship between such fathers and their children often ends up broken and embittered on the part of their children.  If you bring children into this world, then it is your responsibility to stay by them and bring them up.

      God says that the widespread and uncorrected occurrence of this blight of fatherlessness in families brings a curse onto the social life of a nation.  That’s a strong statement!  However, the redemptive ministry of Christ can bring about the necessary healing, reconciliation, and transformation in family relationships, of course.

      Women as mothers have an inner bond with their children which is instinctive and undeniably very deep, and this is a natural consequence of having carried them for nine months in their womb before they were even born.  Men do not and cannot carry unborn children within them, and so, although as fathers they do also develop a deep bond of affection and love for their children as the years go by, this bond is different to that of the children’s mother.  Although ideally it should not happen, yet experience in human life demonstrates repeatedly that men do sometimes forsake their children, for whatever reason, leaving their wives to cope on their own as single mothers.  In the UK, around 24% of children in primary schools now come from single-parent families.

      Furthermore, research has shown repeatedly that children who grow up in fatherless homes are at a higher risk of poverty, of struggling in terms of educational attainment, of experiencing emotional insecurity and low esteem, of having issues with anger and difficulties in their social relationships, of getting involved in inappropriate sexual relationships and the consequences of these, and, for boys, this leads to higher incidences of abuse, crime and imprisonment in adulthood.  Statistically, the prevalence of such problems is much lower in homes where the father remains faithfully present. Smail summed this up in the following way:

‘For myself, I have always been a bit of a worrier, far more the pessimist than the optimist, and I have always guessed, without being psychologist enough to prove it, that the lack of a father in early years has had more than a little to do with it.  Thus for me a father means somebody who is able to regulate the life of his children from a centre outside themselves, to pull them towards wholeness, to accustom them to obedience and so to offer them security…  I have noticed that those who grow up in home where father fulfils his function in a reasonably satisfactory way are that much more likely to have an integrated personality, to be able to cope healthily with the claims of authority, and to have a confident stance towards life that keeps them from many weakening anxieties and crippling fears.’[1]

      The two most common occasions when a man for whatever reason abandons his partner and (perhaps still unborn) child, are:

·        When a child is conceived through premarital sex.  The (often young and immature) man is afraid of the responsibility he then faces as he realises what he has done, and he simply runs away from the situation, abandoning both mother and unborn baby.

·        In the period after a baby is born and through infancy.  This period of life is always highly pressurised and stressful, and it can stretch even the most stalwart and committed parents beyond the limits of their strength.  Some marriages (or cohabitation relationships) crack under the strain of this with the result that the man gives up and leaves.

      Both of these scenarios are a call to the man/father to learn to live and relate responsibly.  The first scenario would not happen if the young man lived in the light of the teachings of the word of God and related honourably to the girl and her family before marriage.  The second is a call to him to grow up, to mature and to develop long-term resilience after the woman becomes pregnant and gives birth to their child(ren).  The blog on the unsung hero develops this point.

 

Copyright Notice

THE HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®, NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.

 

 



[1] Smail, T.A. The Forgotten Father, London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1980, pp.12-13.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Welcome to this blog site!

  THIS BLOG SITE IS STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHILE MORE BLOGS ARE ADDED. IN THE MEANTIME, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO BROWSE THROUGH AND ENJOY THE B...